Research

Overview

To ensure transparency and a voter-centered approach, voters are engaged throughout all stages of the project. Voter and other stakeholder priorities, needs, and preferences have been gathered through a series of research activities, including focus groups, surveys, community discussions, brainstorming sessions, an online crowdsourcing challenge, and interviews.

Findings

Focus Groups, Surveys, & Community Discussions

By partnering with the Voting Technology Project (VTP) and attaining the financial support of the James Irvine Foundation, input was collected through a countywide voter survey, voter focus groups, a pollworker survey, local election official focus groups, and internal discussion groups.

Full Phase I Report

Open Design Search

The Open Design Search was launched to envision what a voting system may look like. This search engaged a broad range of experts, designers, and the general public. The Open Design Search was composed of two elements: 1) an online Open Innovation Challenge and 2) Brainstorming Workshops.

The Open Innovation Challenge took place in partnership with the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) Accessible Voting Technology Initiative. It was funded by a competitive grant from the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission.

Brainstorming workshops were also conducted in partnership with ITIF and the Election Verification Network.

Full Open Design Search Report

Voter Interviews

In partnership with the independent design firm, IDEO, we conducted a series of one-on-one voter interviews. The purpose of the interviews was to learn more about voters' feelings and perspective on the existing voting environment. The interviews help reveal what motivates voters to participate in the electoral process. We found that the three main triggers that affect voters' participation in the process are: 1) Connection, 2) Convenience, and 3) Impact.

More

Connection

Voters want to feel a part of something bigger than themselves, whether symbolic, or with other people. Isolation or separation from others may discourage them from engaging in the process.


Convenience

Voters desire efficiency and ease of use from start to finish. When voters need more time or interaction, they may see the voting experience as inefficient and may deter them altogether.


Impact

Voters are results-driven and want to see that their involvement makes a tangible difference. Not seeing the outcome of their vote, either in the moment or over time, dissuades them from participating.